The raw milk quality from organic and conventional agriculture = Kvalita surového kravského mlieka z ekologického a konvenčného poľnohospodárstva
In the experiment the parameters of milk quality from organic and conventional dairy farm were analyzed. The number of somatic cells was 219.10*3.ml-1 in the organic milk and 242.10*3.ml-1 in the conventional milk. It seems that conditions of organic farming could be able to have a positive effect of health of mammary gland. We found the highest number of somatic … celý popis
Uloženo v:
Podrobná bibliografie
- Další autoři
- , , , , ,
- Typ dokumentu
- Články
- Fyzický popis
- 3 il.
- Publikováno v
- Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis. -- ISSN 1211-8516. -- Roč. 56, č. 5 (2008), s. 25-30
- Témata
- Popis jednotky
- 3 tabulky
- Bibliografie
- Lit. na s. 29
Instituce:
Česká zemědělská a potravinářská bibliografie
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a2200000 a 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | czpb000124064 | ||
| FMT | A | N | |
| LDR | 0 | 0 | |0 0naa a22 a 4500 |
| 003 | CZ PrUZP | ||
| 005 | 20101025104745.0 | ||
| 007 | ta | ||
| 008 | 100617s2008 xr a f b 000 0 eng d | ||
| 040 | |a ABA009 |b cze | ||
| 041 | 0 | |a eng |b slo | |
| 072 | 7 | |a 63 |x Zemědělství a příbuzné oblasti vědy a techniky |2 Konspekt |9 24 | |
| 080 | |a 637.1 |2 MRF | ||
| 080 | |a 636.2 |2 MRF | ||
| 080 | |a 636.08 |2 MRF | ||
| 245 | 0 | 0 | |a The raw milk quality from organic and conventional agriculture = |b Kvalita surového kravského mlieka z ekologického a konvenčného poľnohospodárstva / |c J. Čuboň, V. Foltys, P. Haščík ... [et al.] |
| 246 | 3 | 1 | |a Kvalita surového kravského mlieka z ekologického a konvenčného poľnohospodárstva |
| 300 | |b 3 il. | ||
| 500 | |a 3 tabulky | ||
| 504 | |a Lit. na s. 29 | ||
| 520 | 3 | 9 | |a In the experiment the parameters of milk quality from organic and conventional dairy farm were analyzed. The number of somatic cells was 219.10*3.ml-1 in the organic milk and 242.10*3.ml-1 in the conventional milk. It seems that conditions of organic farming could be able to have a positive effect of health of mammary gland. We found the highest number of somatic cells at the end of the year (336.10*3.ml-1 in organic milk in December, respectively 336.10*3.ml-1 in conventional milk in November). The total bacteria count was higher in organic milk (86.10*3 CFU.ml-1) than conventional (51.10*3 CFU.ml-1) likewise the number of coliform bacteria. Number of coliform bacteria was by conventional milk under 1000 CFU.ml-1 for all samples. The highest number of coliform bacteria in organic milk was achieved in February (1000 CFU.ml-1). We found higher content of fat (4.23 g.100g-1) and protein (3.41 g.100g-1) by organic milk in comparison with the conventional milk (4.11 g.100g-1, resp. 3.39 g.100g-1). The higher content of protein and fat in organic milk and the higher protein content in conventional milk were determined in December. The heat resistance was determined by 96 % ethanol required to coagulation of 2 ml of milk. The conventional milk has significantly lower heat resistance (1.38 ml) than the organic one (1.86 ml). Better heat stability by organic milk and higher content of Ca (144.29 mg.100g-1) correspond with higher technological quality of organic milk. |9 eng |
| 546 | |a Anglický text, slovenský souhrn a anglický abstrakt | ||
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a DAIRY FARMS |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a DAIRY CATTLE |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a DAIRY COWS |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a ANIMAL HUSBANDRY METHODS |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a ORGANIC AGRICULTURE |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a COW MILK |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a QUALITY |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a SOMATIC CELL COUNT |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a BACTERIA |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a CELL COUNTING |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a ENTEROBACTERIACEAE |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a COLIFORM BACTERIA |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a PROXIMATE COMPOSITION |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a LIPID CONTENT |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a MILK FAT |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a PROTEIN CONTENT |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a MILK PROTEIN |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 9 | |a HEAT TOLERANCE |2 agrovoc |
| 653 | 0 | |a konvenční chov | |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a mléčné farmy |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a mléčný skot |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a dojnice |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a metody chovu zvířat |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a organické zemědělství |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a kravské mléko |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a kvalita |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a počet somatických buněk |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a mikrobiologická analýza |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a baktérie |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a počítání buněk |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a Enterobacteriaceae |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a koliformní baktérie |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a přibližné složení |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a obsah lipidů |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a mléčný tuk |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a obsah bílkovin |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a mléčná bílkovina |2 agrovoc |
| 650 | 0 | 7 | |a rezistence k teplu |2 agrovoc |
| 700 | 1 | |a Čuboň, Juraj |7 xx0087328 |u Slovenská poľnohospodárska univerzita, Katedra hodnotenia a spracovania živočíšnych produktov, Nitra, SK |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Foltys, Vladimír, |u Slovenské centrum poľnohospodárskeho výskumu - Výskumný ústav živočíšnej výroby, Nitra, SK |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Haščík, Peter |7 uzp2010555090 |u SPU, Katedra hodnotenia a spracovania živočíšnych produktov, Nitra, SK |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kačániová, Miroslava |7 uzp2010555089 |u SPU, Katedra mikrobiológie, Nitra, SK |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Ubrežiová, Iveta, |d 1963- |7 ola2016928767 |u SPU, Katedra manažmentu, Nitra, SK |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kráčmar, Stanislav, |d 1948- |7 ola2004235499 |u Univerzita Tomáše Bati ve Zlíně, Ústav potravinářského inženýrství |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | |t Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis |x 1211-8516 |g Roč. 56, č. 5 (2008), s. 25-30 |q 56:5 |9 2008 | |
| LKR | |a ITM |b 97179 |l UZP50 |y 2008 | ||
| SIF | |z JA |d 20100617 | ||
| 910 | |a ABA009 |t rs | ||